After reading the article on Tribunal Courts, comment 1. On one point that stuck out to you and why. 2. Is there justice for someone who is responsible for Genocide?
1. The thing that stuck out to me is how there is an international court that takes care of all of these bad things. I never had heard of a court like this before. 2. The only justice you can get out of someone who has done Genocide, is to kill him or lock him up for life. This person needs to be shown that what he did was wrong and he never will be able to do it again. Plus if he was let free he could brainwash others into doing Genocide. That is what I believe you should do to a person who has done Genocide. Derek T R3
One point that stuck out to me is that only a certain selected individuals have committed genocide just because they plotted the genocide or did the direct killing. Quote: "Capable of bringing to justice those individuals who commit genocide." They shouldn't bring justice to just those people. People who plot genocide can't do it without help. For example the Nazis and Hitler tried to make everyone against the Jews so no one would help them when the Final Solution came about. Should justice be brought to those people as well? The people who started to believe that the Jews should be eliminated? And if the justice was spread to them and others, then a great amount of people would start receiving the justice others think they deserve. Would it seem too harsh to "punish" the whole population of Germany for genocide? This adds another question: "Who is responsible for genocide?" Its seems like there is no way to actually bring the justice best fitted for the crime because there is a continuous list for every definition of justice every people can think of. So it goes back to my point that just bringing justice to a certain select few isn't right in my opinion but then that is also controversial.
According to the dictionary, justice is explained to be fair . And the worse punishment anyone would think to give could be capital punishment. Would it be fair to kill someone who had killed a large amount of people based on who they were? I think a majority of the answers would be no. Killing that person isn't going to bring back all the people that the person had killed. But if you can't kill the person then what's left to do? There are many other options but they don't seem fit for genocide and they also don't seem fair. Even if you kill the guy and get the vengeance you've probably wanted, it still doesn't feel any better. This goes to the point that there can be no justice for someone who is responsible for genocide. But that's just the dictionary version of justice, to get the fair treatment. But there has to be some kind of action towards genocide right? It just seems the right thing to do. If you can't bring justice then what can you give or do?
One point that stood out to me was that the ICC treaty wasn't adopted until 1998, and then went into force in 2002. I think that it should have been established way earlier than that in order to help and protect people. I think it would have helped awhile ago with the Holocaust and other situations. There is justice for someone who is responsible for genocide, but there wasn't really back than. But it is sad that the justice will not bring back all of the innocent people.
The thing that caught my attention more than anything else in that article is that countries that represent most of the world, and all the regions all think that it's a good idea. I can't believe that everyone can agree on something. The United States has so many problems getting along with all the other countries because we feel that everyone is equal. Some other countries believe that too, but what about the ones that don't think that everyone is equal? I'm just surprised that that many leaders could come to an agreement about how to treat international crimanals, since some places use torture, some kill, some want appologies, some want all sorts of things for justice, while in America, we usually give jail time. I don't think there is anyway to really have justice in a case where Genocide is the issue. I think that some poeple just can't be helped. If a person is really the one that is responsible for the murders of thousands of people, then they can't be helped, and they would be better off not trying to make up for what they did. Today we heard about some reporters that were given the death penalty for Genocide, for making people want to kill off others. I don't think that is fair, the people they convinced to kill were just as ignorant as them, and they all should have been killed if that's how you want to look at it. But I don't think anyone deserves to die. Just a thought.
I do not think that there is any form of justice for a mass murderer. Nothing can undo what they have done, and if there was a punishment worse than death, they would deserve it.
What stood out to me was the irony of universal jurisdiction. Its concept involves all countries caring about genocide. But I think that that's ironic, seeing how there are countries that commit it themselves.
1. One thing that stuck out to me was that the 1st arrest was in 2006 and there has been Genocide long before that but they only finally arrested someone in 2006. 2. I don't think there is fair justice for someone responsible for Genocide. You could kill them but that doesn't make up for all the lifes they took. Some people would say well they killed so you kill them but if you are looking at the eye for an eye that only makes up for one person what about the millions of others.
One point that stuck out to me in the artice was in the Factsheet One. I think that it's very important that the countries around the world have made an organization such as the ICC (International Criminal Court). The reason why I think it's good to have something like this is becasue there should be one set of laws that the world should follow against large problems such as genocide. Genocide is such a big problem because it normally occurs between a large area so they local governments shouldn't decide on it because they are probably behind it if it's happening in their territory. Therefore, all the countries in the world should have say about the situation. I believe that there isn't a direct kind of justice for someone who is responsible for genocide, but there are different ways that can punish them. For example, the death penatly or a life sentense in prison. These two examples are very harsh but they do fit a crime as horrible as genocide. -Ben Burkey
1:I thought it was interesting how the International Criminal Court tries to give justice to the the criminals who have commited horrible crimes.They help them when the state is unable or unwilling to do so. I think that's really good and unusual. It shows that many people really beleive in bringing justice into the world. 2: The ICC has given justice to the people responsible for Genocide. Also, Universal Jurisdiction tries to bring justice to those who have commited the worst of crimes, no matter the place. ~Aleina
The quote on the hand at the top of the page, I believe in justice with no borders stick out to me. At the beginning of the page it talked about where to world was going to today. The physical borders that separate countries and there, and they're dividing us. If we don't do anything about it, which we won't, they will continue t divide us and we will no longer have an affective system, if you consider our system of justice civil now. The first fact sheet, (ICC) seemed good because they can punish people who committed genocide and their state won't send them to court. The second fact sheet (Universal Jurisdiction) is good because it doesn't discriminate against race, or the location of the crime. The fourth fact sheet (victims rights) is good because it ensures the victim will be given proper rights and will be taken care of.
I was surprised that the ICC was only established in 1998, and that was something that really stood out to me. If the ICC was put into place earlier than that, like maybe around the time of the Holocaust, then we could have prevented many problems, or at least stop them before they had gotten so out of hand. People who are responsible for genocide should be punished, but so should everyone who helped in the crime. The people who should be the first priority out of all the people who were involved in genocide should be the leaders and the people who controlled it, but you can't forget about the people who helped out. Genocides wouldn't be able to be taken into action unless there were supporters, and if they didn't there probably wouldn't even be a genocide. People who supported it should be brought to justice as well as the main leaders.
1. One thing that stuck out to me with I read the acticle was that the International Criminal Court made there first arrest in March of 2006. The International Criminal Court was adopted in 1998 and was enterd into force in 2002. The International Criminal Court was made only one arrest and it took them 4 years to do it or maybe 3 years and a couple of months.
2. I think the there is no justice for someone who is responsible for Genocide. You could punish them for what they have done by giving them the death penalty or sentencing to life in prison, but what would the solve. With the death penalty all your doin is just killing a man or woman that killed millions of people, but that won't solve anything. With the sentencing them to a life in prison it won't matter to them. They'll just think that your give them a place to live for free with three meals a day. Is there justice in the world at all? Killing people that killed other people won't solve anything at all. Sure it may help they spirits of the ones that were killed feel good about knowing that their killer is dead. But is that the only way people can find justice. Sure, we could sentence people to life in prison, but would that affect them at all. Some people won't care if they had to live in a prison for the rest of their life. Having a place to sleep and having three meal's a day and not having to pay some people would enjoy that kind of life.
I think that what stood out to me was the Factsheet 1 about The International Criminal Courts, and how it works.I found it facinatiing how they try to give justice to people who have commited Genocide. I honestly do not think that there is justice for someone invlolved with Genocide. There are some consequences in giving people justice when they have done such a crime. They could do it again, or even persuade people to do it. I do not believe these kinds of people should have the rights. - Lia B. R4
1-Something that stuck out to me in the article is the International Criminal Court (ICC) and what its for because I did not know know that they had a place like that.
2- I don't really know if there is justice for someone who commits Genocide. The best possible solution would probably be to give them the death sentence as punishment for ending the lives of many other people, but its also a good idea to keep them alive and in prison for life so they can actually pay for what they've done. Although it also wouldn't be fair that the person who commited genocide would be allowed to live while the person killed many others.
1. One point that stck out to me is how many countries are still trying to deny that a genocide occured. Turkey was probably the most obvious example of this, after their genocide during WWI it is amazing how the government can try to cover something so large and still havn't given up. 2. I think it would be very hard to find justice for somebody who committed or was part of a genocide. How do you punish somebody who comitted a genocide fairly without comittig a genocide yourself. I think the most somebody could sentence somebody for this crime to is death, but still it will not make up for the deaths that this person caused.
i don't think there is justice for someone who has commited genocide besides putting them to death, but killing someone who had killed thousands of people is eqivalent with eachother so i think there isn't justice for this particular crime.
The one thing that stuck out to me in this article is that there is a court called the international criminal court and it is specifically for criminals that commit genocide crimes but what strikes me is it was established in 1998, but it wasn't put into affect untill 2002.
Justice should be a reasonable way of dealing with something. So, everyone should be treated humainly and respectfully, no matter what they did to be in a situation of justice. In factsheet 4 it mentions how everyone is treated in respect with their confidentiality, privacy, how they are taken care of, etc. just basic rights. That stood out to me, because every American deserves to be respected and treated fairly. But, the criminals acted wrong, endangering other Americans. So, why shouldn't they be endangered? why must they be treated right even though they can't treat others the same way? Giving is better then recieving, no matter how good or bad you were brought up. Many people, especially thugs and homeless arn't afraid of justice because if they go in a jail cell, they get food and a place to stay. So, they are willing to do a crime and pay the time. I believe there is justice for anyone responsible for genocide. If Nazis can kill innocent people for no reason, then they should DEFINATELY be able to recieve the death penalty for murder, torture, slavery and rape. The only problem is, the one life taken from a Nazi, doesn't cover up all of the Jewish people that one man killed in all of his lifetime. It's ridiculous that someone could take the lives away from innocent people, through torture, just because of their religion.
This stood out to me because I am glad that they have this law now but if it had come into action sooner millions of lives could have been saved. But even though those lives were not save, genoside that happeneds in the future can be stopped.
Victims rights
I also like this one because it gives hope for peole who have been victims, they have the right to know the truth and to be given a fair trial.
1) The thing that stuck out to me the most is that there's an international court that takes care of big problem like genocide. I had no idea.
2) There is no justice for someone who commits genocide. It is to harmful of a crime to terrible. But the best fit justice is death penalty, maybe by torture. TO try to make the person suffer half as much as all those innocent people did.
There should be no justice for a person the commits genocide because they are kill innonocent people just because of there race or religion or there. I think people that commit these awful crimes should either be put in jail for a long tim or be killed for what they do.
1. What stuck out to me was that seeing that countries having civil rights seems to prevail. This stuck out to me because civil rights is a very important thing. 2.I believe there is no justice for genocide unless the murderer can be killed 100's of times because in no way will he ever feel the pain he brought to other people
1. One point that stuck out to me was when it mentions that we live in an increasingly globalized and interdependent world. I believe this is fitting for the article because, Justice really depends on how people view the crime or wrong doing. It also depends on how the criminal themselves view it. This is very important, because in a court case, people are very interdependent on everybody around them and relys on certain people. In the end, the world is increasingly globalized and interdependent because no one can do everything alone. 2.I do not think there is justice for anyone who has done Genocide. I say this because, when someone is trialed they get punishment for what type of crime they did. But in the case of Genocide, they took the lives of thousands. How can one life make up for over 1,000 people. There's no use in trying to justify them.
1) Something that stuck out to me was that the ICC wasn't established until 1998, and it didn't go into force until 2002. I think that if it was established earlier a lot of problems wouldn't have occured and it may have stopped some genocides. 2) I don't really know what justice is for someone who is responcible for genocide. The only thing I think you can really do is kill them, since that is the worst punishment out there. Although, I'm not really sure if that is justice, one death doesn't seem like it's a big enough consequence for thousands, or millions, but that seems like the only thing you can do. -Maddie T
I remember reading this article and brainstorming what to do with somebody who is accused of a genocide. Killing them could be a form of justice, but what about the starvation and pain the person made the others go through? Should he go through the same punishment they went through? That's what really struck out to me. -Emily Lowell, R3
Justice for a mass murderer is hard because most people want him to torture him until he feels the pain of all the people he has killed but it wont happen because its impossible for someone to cause that much pain and suffering to feel pain or any other type of emotion besides happiness for what he has done. The real and only punishment would be for him to go through the exact same things as what he has committed so he knows what he has done to the people he has tortured and will be made an example of dk r2
1. Something that I found interesting was the ICC because I had no clue that it existed.
2. I believe that there is not justice for someone who is responsible for Genocide. If they are responsible for the death's of many innocent people than I think that they do not deserve justice.
1. One thing that stood out to me was the International Criminal court because they pretty much deal with mostly genocides and its interesting how they don't deal with the united starts they just deal with other countries. 2. I think someone who is responsible for genocide the is no justice because they were the leader for killing a ton of people. Also there is no justice for some one who was part of the killing for the genocide because they still killed people for no good reason. -Tanner Hyland
1. The thing that stuck out to me is how there is an international court that takes care of all of these bad things. I never had heard of a court like this before.
ReplyDelete2. The only justice you can get out of someone who has done Genocide, is to kill him or lock him up for life. This person needs to be shown that what he did was wrong and he never will be able to do it again. Plus if he was let free he could brainwash others into doing Genocide. That is what I believe you should do to a person who has done Genocide.
Derek T R3
One point that stuck out to me is that only a certain selected individuals have committed genocide just because they plotted the genocide or did the direct killing. Quote: "Capable of bringing to justice those individuals who commit genocide." They shouldn't bring justice to just those people. People who plot genocide can't do it without help. For example the Nazis and Hitler tried to make everyone against the Jews so no one would help them when the Final Solution came about. Should justice be brought to those people as well? The people who started to believe that the Jews should be eliminated? And if the justice was spread to them and others, then a great amount of people would start receiving the justice others think they deserve. Would it seem too harsh to "punish" the whole population of Germany for genocide? This adds another question: "Who is responsible for genocide?" Its seems like there is no way to actually bring the justice best fitted for the crime because there is a continuous list for every definition of justice every people can think of. So it goes back to my point that just bringing justice to a certain select few isn't right in my opinion but then that is also controversial.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the dictionary, justice is explained to be fair . And the worse punishment anyone would think to give could be capital punishment. Would it be fair to kill someone who had killed a large amount of people based on who they were? I think a majority of the answers would be no. Killing that person isn't going to bring back all the people that the person had killed. But if you can't kill the person then what's left to do? There are many other options but they don't seem fit for genocide and they also don't seem fair. Even if you kill the guy and get the vengeance you've probably wanted, it still doesn't feel any better. This goes to the point that there can be no justice for someone who is responsible for genocide. But that's just the dictionary version of justice, to get the fair treatment. But there has to be some kind of action towards genocide right? It just seems the right thing to do. If you can't bring justice then what can you give or do?
Thuy Nguyen R4
One point that stood out to me was that the ICC treaty wasn't adopted until 1998, and then went into force in 2002. I think that it should have been established way earlier than that in order to help and protect people. I think it would have helped awhile ago with the Holocaust and other situations. There is justice for someone who is responsible for genocide, but there wasn't really back than. But it is sad that the justice will not bring back all of the innocent people.
ReplyDeleteJaclyn Salevsky Red 4
The thing that caught my attention more than anything else in that article is that countries that represent most of the world, and all the regions all think that it's a good idea. I can't believe that everyone can agree on something. The United States has so many problems getting along with all the other countries because we feel that everyone is equal. Some other countries believe that too, but what about the ones that don't think that everyone is equal? I'm just surprised that that many leaders could come to an agreement about how to treat international crimanals, since some places use torture, some kill, some want appologies, some want all sorts of things for justice, while in America, we usually give jail time.
ReplyDeleteI don't think there is anyway to really have justice in a case where Genocide is the issue. I think that some poeple just can't be helped. If a person is really the one that is responsible for the murders of thousands of people, then they can't be helped, and they would be better off not trying to make up for what they did. Today we heard about some reporters that were given the death penalty for Genocide, for making people want to kill off others. I don't think that is fair, the people they convinced to kill were just as ignorant as them, and they all should have been killed if that's how you want to look at it. But I don't think anyone deserves to die. Just a thought.
I do not think that there is any form of justice for a mass murderer. Nothing can undo what they have done, and if there was a punishment worse than death, they would deserve it.
ReplyDeleteWhat stood out to me was the irony of universal jurisdiction. Its concept involves all countries caring about genocide. But I think that that's ironic, seeing how there are countries that commit it themselves.
Brian Weden
1. One thing that stuck out to me was that the 1st arrest was in 2006 and there has been Genocide long before that but they only finally arrested someone in 2006.
ReplyDelete2. I don't think there is fair justice for someone responsible for Genocide. You could kill them but that doesn't make up for all the lifes they took. Some people would say well they killed so you kill them but if you are looking at the eye for an eye that only makes up for one person what about the millions of others.
~Danielle Bergner Red 3
One point that stuck out to me in the artice was in the Factsheet One. I think that it's very important that the countries around the world have made an organization such as the ICC (International Criminal Court). The reason why I think it's good to have something like this is becasue there should be one set of laws that the world should follow against large problems such as genocide. Genocide is such a big problem because it normally occurs between a large area so they local governments shouldn't decide on it because they are probably behind it if it's happening in their territory. Therefore, all the countries in the world should have say about the situation.
ReplyDeleteI believe that there isn't a direct kind of justice for someone who is responsible for genocide, but there are different ways that can punish them. For example, the death penatly or a life sentense in prison. These two examples are very harsh but they do fit a crime as horrible as genocide.
-Ben Burkey
1:I thought it was interesting how the International Criminal Court tries to give justice to the the criminals who have commited horrible crimes.They help them when the state is unable or unwilling to do so. I think that's really good and unusual. It shows that many people really beleive in bringing justice into the world.
ReplyDelete2: The ICC has given justice to the people responsible for Genocide. Also, Universal Jurisdiction tries to bring justice to those who have commited the worst of crimes, no matter the place.
~Aleina
The quote on the hand at the top of the page, I believe in justice with no borders stick out to me. At the beginning of the page it talked about where to world was going to today. The physical borders that separate countries and there, and they're dividing us. If we don't do anything about it, which we won't, they will continue t divide us and we will no longer have an affective system, if you consider our system of justice civil now. The first fact sheet, (ICC) seemed good because they can punish people who committed genocide and their state won't send them to court. The second fact sheet (Universal Jurisdiction) is good because it doesn't discriminate against race, or the location of the crime. The fourth fact sheet (victims rights) is good because it ensures the victim will be given proper rights and will be taken care of.
ReplyDeleteOlivia Hamlin
I was surprised that the ICC was only established in 1998, and that was something that really stood out to me. If the ICC was put into place earlier than that, like maybe around the time of the Holocaust, then we could have prevented many problems, or at least stop them before they had gotten so out of hand.
ReplyDeletePeople who are responsible for genocide should be punished, but so should everyone who helped in the crime. The people who should be the first priority out of all the people who were involved in genocide should be the leaders and the people who controlled it, but you can't forget about the people who helped out. Genocides wouldn't be able to be taken into action unless there were supporters, and if they didn't there probably wouldn't even be a genocide. People who supported it should be brought to justice as well as the main leaders.
Lani Edwards, 1/7/10, Red 3
1. One thing that stuck out to me with I read the acticle was that the International Criminal Court made there first arrest in March of 2006. The International Criminal Court was adopted in 1998 and was enterd into force in 2002. The International Criminal Court was made only one arrest and it took them 4 years to do it or maybe 3 years and a couple of months.
ReplyDelete2. I think the there is no justice for someone who is responsible for Genocide. You could punish them for what they have done by giving them the death penalty or sentencing to life in prison, but what would the solve. With the death penalty all your doin is just killing a man or woman that killed millions of people, but that won't solve anything. With the sentencing them to a life in prison it won't matter to them. They'll just think that your give them a place to live for free with three meals a day. Is there justice in the world at all? Killing people that killed other people won't solve anything at all. Sure it may help they spirits of the ones that were killed feel good about knowing that their killer is dead. But is that the only way people can find justice. Sure, we could sentence people to life in prison, but would that affect them at all. Some people won't care if they had to live in a prison for the rest of their life. Having a place to sleep and having three meal's a day and not having to pay some people would enjoy that kind of life.
Bao Loc R4
I think that what stood out to me was the Factsheet 1 about The International Criminal Courts, and how it works.I found it facinatiing how they try to give justice to people who have commited Genocide.
ReplyDeleteI honestly do not think that there is justice for someone invlolved with Genocide. There are some consequences in giving people justice when they have done such a crime. They could do it again, or even persuade people to do it. I do not believe these kinds of people should have the rights.
-
Lia B. R4
1-Something that stuck out to me in the article is the International Criminal Court (ICC) and what its for because I did not know know that they had a place like that.
ReplyDelete2- I don't really know if there is justice for someone who commits Genocide. The best possible solution would probably be to give them the death sentence as punishment for ending the lives of many other people, but its also a good idea to keep them alive and in prison for life so they can actually pay for what they've done. Although it also wouldn't be fair that the person who commited genocide would be allowed to live while the person killed many others.
Andrea Zarate Red Day Block 4
1. One point that stck out to me is how many countries are still trying to deny that a genocide occured. Turkey was probably the most obvious example of this, after their genocide during WWI it is amazing how the government can try to cover something so large and still havn't given up.
ReplyDelete2. I think it would be very hard to find justice for somebody who committed or was part of a genocide. How do you punish somebody who comitted a genocide fairly without comittig a genocide yourself. I think the most somebody could sentence somebody for this crime to is death, but still it will not make up for the deaths that this person caused.
i don't think there is justice for someone who has commited genocide besides putting them to death, but killing someone who had killed thousands of people is eqivalent with eachother so i think there isn't justice for this particular crime.
ReplyDeleteThe one thing that stuck out to me in this article is that there is a court called the international criminal court and it is specifically for criminals that commit genocide crimes but what strikes me is it was established in 1998, but it wasn't put into affect untill 2002.
~Ryan Tuttle
Justice should be a reasonable way of dealing with something. So, everyone should be treated humainly and respectfully, no matter what they did to be in a situation of justice. In factsheet 4 it mentions how everyone is treated in respect with their confidentiality, privacy, how they are taken care of, etc. just basic rights. That stood out to me, because every American deserves to be respected and treated fairly. But, the criminals acted wrong, endangering other Americans. So, why shouldn't they be endangered? why must they be treated right even though they can't treat others the same way? Giving is better then recieving, no matter how good or bad you were brought up. Many people, especially thugs and homeless arn't afraid of justice because if they go in a jail cell, they get food and a place to stay. So, they are willing to do a crime and pay the time.
ReplyDeleteI believe there is justice for anyone responsible for genocide. If Nazis can kill innocent people for no reason, then they should DEFINATELY be able to recieve the death penalty for murder, torture, slavery and rape. The only problem is, the one life taken from a Nazi, doesn't cover up all of the Jewish people that one man killed in all of his lifetime. It's ridiculous that someone could take the lives away from innocent people, through torture, just because of their religion.
LuLu Marchant
Block 3 Red
The international criminal court
ReplyDeleteThis stood out to me because I am glad that they have this law now but if it had come into action sooner millions of lives could have been saved. But even though those lives were not save, genoside that happeneds in the future can be stopped.
Victims rights
I also like this one because it gives hope for peole who have been victims, they have the right to know the truth and to be given a fair trial.
Sarah St.Pierre R3
1) The thing that stuck out to me the most is that there's an international court that takes care of big problem like genocide. I had no idea.
ReplyDelete2) There is no justice for someone who commits genocide. It is to harmful of a crime to terrible. But the best fit justice is death penalty, maybe by torture. TO try to make the person suffer half as much as all those innocent people did.
Cal Carr
There should be no justice for a person the commits genocide because they are kill innonocent people just because of there race or religion or there. I think people that commit these awful crimes should either be put in jail for a long tim or be killed for what they do.
ReplyDelete1. What stuck out to me was that seeing that countries having civil rights seems to prevail. This stuck out to me because civil rights is a very important thing.
ReplyDelete2.I believe there is no justice for genocide unless the murderer can be killed 100's of times because in no way will he ever feel the pain he brought to other people
1. One point that stuck out to me was when it mentions that we live in an increasingly globalized and interdependent world. I believe this is fitting for the article because, Justice really depends on how people view the crime or wrong doing. It also depends on how the criminal themselves view it. This is very important, because in a court case, people are very interdependent on everybody around them and relys on certain people. In the end, the world is increasingly globalized and interdependent because no one can do everything alone.
ReplyDelete2.I do not think there is justice for anyone who has done Genocide. I say this because, when someone is trialed they get punishment for what type of crime they did. But in the case of Genocide, they took the lives of thousands. How can one life make up for over 1,000 people. There's no use in trying to justify them.
Sean Duong
R4
1) Something that stuck out to me was that the ICC wasn't established until 1998, and it didn't go into force until 2002. I think that if it was established earlier a lot of problems wouldn't have occured and it may have stopped some genocides.
ReplyDelete2) I don't really know what justice is for someone who is responcible for genocide. The only thing I think you can really do is kill them, since that is the worst punishment out there. Although, I'm not really sure if that is justice, one death doesn't seem like it's a big enough consequence for thousands, or millions, but that seems like the only thing you can do.
-Maddie T
I remember reading this article and brainstorming what to do with somebody who is accused of a genocide. Killing them could be a form of justice, but what about the starvation and pain the person made the others go through? Should he go through the same punishment they went through?
ReplyDeleteThat's what really struck out to me.
-Emily Lowell, R3
Justice for a mass murderer is hard because most people want him to torture him until he feels the pain of all the people he has killed but it wont happen because its impossible for someone to cause that much pain and suffering to feel pain or any other type of emotion besides happiness for what he has done. The real and only punishment would be for him to go through the exact same things as what he has committed so he knows what he has done to the people he has tortured and will be made an example of
ReplyDeletedk r2
1. Something that I found interesting was the ICC because I had no clue that it existed.
ReplyDelete2. I believe that there is not justice for someone who is responsible for Genocide. If they are responsible for the death's of many innocent people than I think that they do not deserve justice.
~Lyndsay L.
Something that stood out to me was the ICC made their first arrest in March, 2006
ReplyDeleteI don't think there's justice for anyone who commited genocide beacuse they are responsable for a lot of people's deaths
-Molly Miller
r3
1. One thing that stood out to me was the International Criminal court because they pretty much deal with mostly genocides and its interesting how they don't deal with the united starts they just deal with other countries.
ReplyDelete2. I think someone who is responsible for genocide the is no justice because they were the leader for killing a ton of people. Also there is no justice for some one who was part of the killing for the genocide because they still killed people for no good reason.
-Tanner Hyland